Getting Recovery Done- GTD, Recovery, and Relapse Prevention

Hi, my name is Paul, and I’m a recovering Sex Addict. I’m also a Getting Things Done fanatic. For those that don’t know, Getting Things Done is a methodology for improved productivity and time management, developed by a fellow named David Allen.

I’m not going to waste the bits to talk about the GTD methodology. If you google GTD, you’ll find tons of information, or grab a copy of the book Getting Things Done. It’s probably at your library, as it’s been around a while.

There are several computer programs that use GTD for just about any platform out there. I ended up choosing a program called DOIIT.IM, because for me, it worked on the platforms I needed, and wasn’t too expensive at $20 bucks a year. (BTW, they do offer both a free Web-only version, and a 30 day trial of the full version, if you want to check it out.)

I do want to focus on addiction and GTD. How can implementing a program like GTD help the addict stay in recovery.

In Chapter 12 of the book Breaking the Cycle: Free Yourself from Sex Addiction, Porn Obsession, and Shame, authors George Collins and Andrew Adelman discuss the concept of “First Thought Wrong”. Unlike the spontaneous thinkers in Gladwell’s Blink, the intuition of the addict is flawed. By default, they will, without thinking, gravitate towards their addiction. The goal of a good recovery program should be to put space in between the flawed intuitive reaction, so that the addict can stop, think, and pursue alternatives.

With a GTD system in place, the addict can always turn to a list of alternatives to acting out, things that will be positive and move him towards a planned project or goal.  Instead of wasting time acting out, the addict is given a choice to use time effectively.

GTD is also positive for the addict because it helps her reduce the stress with trying to juggle too many things in the head, and the resultant crash. Finally, GTD can assist with the planning of time to work on recovery as a goal.

I stumbled upon this by accident, and I felt that it would be good to share with others moving from shame to grace. If you’d like any help with GTD or recovery, please feel free to reach out to me.

 

 

Dr. Ley and “The Myth of Sex Addiction”. Dangerous Medicine

I regularly read the various scholarly journals and popular press on articles related to addiction. Psychology Today is regularly included in my studies. It is disconcerting to me that the major contributor at the magazine on articles related to sex addiction doesn’t believe that it is a bona fide diagnosis. To those who are suffering from this disorder, and looking for help, this can be a very dangerous message.

Dr. David Ley is the author of “The Myth of Sex Addiction”, a controversial book that is based on the premise that Sex Addiction, unlike substance abuse, is not a disease. It would not be fair of me to review the book at this time, because I have not read it. (I have requested a copy through my library, and will post specifically on the book after I do read it)

It is fair game for me to comment on an article that Dr. Ley posted on Psychology Today, titled, “The Profit in Sex Addiction”. where he views sex addition as being a diagnosis created largely for the gain of for-profit rehabilitation centers. He argues that because leaders in the field of sex addiction, like Patrick Carnes and Steven Arteburn make a living off of their work, that they are not objective advocates for the field of sex addiction.

Dr. Ley neglects to mention that he doesn’t do his own work out of the goodness of his heart, in fact, he is considered by the media as one of the “go to” people for the contrarian view that sex addiction is not a valid diagnosis.

The thesis that sex addiction does not exist because there are people making a profit off it is flawed and dangerous. Sex addiction does exist, without a doubt to all of those people who regularly attend 12 Step Meetings like those of SAA and SA. Denying that this is a problem denies people a chance at salvaging lives that were destroyed by inappropriate sexual conduct. Although these people are powerless themselves over their sexual compulsions, many have effectively changed their lives with the help of the group, their sponsors, and a Higher Power.

Many of those who are addicted need help, and those with the financial means may chose ways to replace or supplement the benefits they receive from being part of a 12 Step Program. Like substance addiction, some of these people enter for-profit programs. That a program is for-profit does not necessarily make it bad (it doesn’t necessarily make it good, however).

It’s not correct to write off sex addiction as fake because there are some charlatans out there. Nor is it right to write off sex addiction because some people who aren’t addicts hide behind the diagnosis to justify inappropriate behavior. There are many otherwise good people who struggle with this problem, and many who are able to change their lives with help. I sincerely hope that the thoughts of those like Dr. Ley. dissuade those out there who need help from getting it.

More work needs to be done in this field. As of yet, there are neurological studies that deal primarily with sex addiction. The arguments that pro sex-addiction therapists give regarding addiction and brain chemistry (affecting dopamine levels. oxytocin levels, and pathway changes) have not been studied directly with sexual addiction, because this research is not being funded.

What we do have are lots and lots of people, who, despite their own self will, are unable to manage their sexual behaviors. Lives are lost, marriages are destroyed, and financial hardship is endured because of sex addiction.

We also have lots and lots of people who find treatment works for them, with a 12 step program, and/or other kinds of therapy.  Let’s keep that door open, until the science proves otherwise. I’m almost certain it won’t.